Jump to content
  • Welcome to 205GTIDrivers.com!

    Hello dear visitor! Feel free to browse but we invite you to register completely free of charge in order to enjoy the full functionality of the website.

Sign in to follow this  
Guest paulthai

Xu9j4 Big Valves And Regrinds Cams?

Recommended Posts

DrSarty
no transmittion loss etc.

 

That's unavoidable I'm afraid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
engine killer
That's unavoidable I'm afraid.

 

 

ahh, quite right. flywheel slips too. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest paulthai

Now The head ported already.

The all plan delay for long time.

So busy.

 

Next week put and testing run before Songkran Splendours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest paulthai

Now engine start and good work. Next week I try on dyno.

 

Sorry I will post the image later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DrSarty
Now engine start and good work. Next week I try on dyno.

 

Sorry I will post the image later.

 

And.....? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
woodsy

I have a rebuilt mi motor, lightened + balanced bottom end, twin 45's, 4-2-1 manifold and catcam inlet cam and managed 173bhp @ wheels

other day on rollers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DrSarty
I have a rebuilt mi motor, lightened + balanced bottom end, twin 45's, 4-2-1 manifold and catcam inlet cam and managed 173bhp @ wheels

other day on rollers.

 

Somehow that strikes me as an optimistic reading. Secondly peak BHP is not everything.

 

Maxi was saying how two neighbouring RRs he knows read one car at 220 and the other RR read it at 240. This is a 10% inaccuracy.

 

173 @ the wheels is an awful lot.

 

The graphs for that would be interesting if you'll post them?

Edited by DrSarty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
woodsy
Somehow that strikes me as an optimistic reading. Secondly peak BHP is not everything.

 

Maxi was saying how two neighbouring RRs he knows read one car at 220 and the other RR read it at 240. This is a 10% inaccuracy.

 

173 @ the wheels is an awful lot.

 

The graphs for that would be interesting if you'll post them?

 

Hi mate, i posted the figures in a post other day not in a graph but showing BHP at RPM.If someone could put in a graph would be

great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×