Jump to content
  • Welcome to 205GTIDrivers.com!

    Hello dear visitor! Feel free to browse but we invite you to register completely free of charge in order to enjoy the full functionality of the website.

Sign in to follow this  
aarontrophy

2.0 8V Turbo Exhaust

Recommended Posts

aarontrophy

Hi guys,

 

Is 3 inch system from manifold all the way to big?

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
welshpug

depends on power level and turbo size, I would imagine 2.5" would be more suitable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mang

I run a 2 3/4 looks good sounds good power level great :-) I know people the use 3" fine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
P2trick

if used 2,5" perfect for this kind engine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stef205

its more about flow rather than diameter of piping, i use 2.5" with 3 highflow boxes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mang

2.5 is no good if you want to run alot of power just get the 3" doesnt matter if its to big and then you know if you do want to run silly power you can :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stef205

Absolute rubbish this has been discussed loads of times on here. Matt on here was/is running almost 400bhp on a 2.5" system on his 180 charged engine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kuuner

Yeah, but 400 bhp with a 2,5" is too small. Is the same as you breathe trough a reed. You get enough air in order not to die, but you will not breathe easy. Try to fit a 3" exhaust and you will notice that the turbo spools up quicker and probably produces the same bhp at lower psi.

 

For what I know is 2.5" adequate to max. 250~300 bhp. That's what they adviced me for my set-up. If you're on the max. you could consider to mount a 3" downpipe and go to 2,5" in the middle. The exhaust gases cool anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mang

All I can say is good for matt thats not how I would run my car considering the mass of uneeded back pressure

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
welshpug

mass of uneeded back pressure

 

which is not there because he has specified the correct size for his application, not built a fart cannon, with good reason as its a track car and needs to be a sensible volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tom Fenton

I think in actual fact he took off a 3" system to replace with a 2.5" system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Henry Yorke

Matts was supercharged though, not turbocharged, so the back pressure would have less impact on the turbo and the scavenge effect is needed more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kuuner

Ah okay, i missed that part. :blush:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×