Jump to content
  • Welcome to 205GTIDrivers.com!

    Hello dear visitor! Feel free to browse but we invite you to register completely free of charge in order to enjoy the full functionality of the website.

Sign in to follow this  
Dave G

309 Suspension On A 205

Recommended Posts

Dave G

i keep reading about the 309 suspension components being used on a 205

 

what benefit etc does it give and shold these parts be modified before use to make them fit or work better for tarmac use

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sandy

Front arms from the 309 widen the track usefully and induce a small amount of negative camber, which combine to improve front end bite and grip. The steering does become slightly less natural, but not unpleasantly so. The 309 front ARB is too thick and best avoided IMO.

 

Using the 309 rear beam over-stabilises the rear IMO, it's countered a bit by the thicker bars, but upgrading the rear bars on a 205 axle is a much better solution for overall handling balance (IMO).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Miles

I take it by Tarmac use it's for a Rally car? if so I would go for adjustable bottom arm's as you get get both sides right as with most 205's very vary from side to side these day's. but the 309 Arm's will help if budget is a issue.

 

Agree with Sandy on this, the 205 beam is a much better bet with upgraded bars etc, I know allot of people disagree with this but 205's have won champinships using a 205 beam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
McPikie

So if you had 309 bottom arms and 1600 hubs, this would widen the track even more??

 

What kind of uprated bars do you guys suggest for a fast road, track car? Something to cock a leg in the air?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sandy

For handling balance, 20mm with about 180-200lb/in fronts, but it's the ARB that will pick up the inside wheel, not necessarily ideal for progressive handling, but alot of people seem to like the feel of a thicker ARB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anthony
So if you had 309 bottom arms and 1600 hubs, this would widen the track even more??

Yes, but then you've a problem with driveshafts - the longer 309 driveshafts use the large 1.9 type spline fitting, and you risk the driveshaft CV's popping out and/or pulling away from the diff under full lock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Miles

Unless you can find some of the old Group N front hub's which used the 1.6 offset but 1.9 bearing, but these are as rare as rocking horse p**

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dave G

so the bottom arms are best changed for some adjustable ones, is there a proven supplier for parts that seems to stand out for this sort of part.

 

and as long at the 205 rear beam isnt worn then stick with it?

Edited by Dave G

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dave G

And the standard hubs with fit striaght on, i take it i will need the drive shafts for the extra width

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
richsmells

309 gti hubs are identical to 205 1.9 gti hubs. Just the wishbones and driveshafts differ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alastairh
i take it i will need the drive shafts for the extra width

 

Yeah. Some people say you can get away with 205 lengths, but i don't agree. I've had them vibrate on me before on hard cornering, and at the end of the day, Peugeot wouldn't of designed them to be longer for no reason would they?

 

Al

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tom_m
Some people say you can get away with 205 lengths, but i don't agree.

Al

 

me for one, i've run both my 205s on 309 wishbones with 205 shafts for years with no ill effect and will continue to do so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
t16ryan
me for one, i've run both my 205s on 309 wishbones with 205 shafts for years with no ill effect and will continue to do so

 

I have also used 205 shafts with 309 arms and had no problems, even under heavy track use :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tom_m
I have also used 205 shafts with 309 arms and had no problems, even under heavy track use :(

 

took mine to the ring and hammered it round carousel a few times, if anything were gonna break it would be there! :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dave G

sounds good.

 

Will be starting the car after christmas more intensivly and will start a work in progress thread for you all to give opinions on.

 

thanks for the pointers peoples

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VisaGTi16v

Slight thread hijack but firstly I have spoken to a couple of 205 racers and they have run big power engines with 309 arms and shorter 1.6 shafts and have been ok but one said his do click around paddocks. I have moved to this setup on mine but think I will go back for the tight sprint courses unless.....

 

Presumably you can fit 1.6 calipers to 1.9 hubs as it works the other way round. What discs would I need though for the correct offset? I cannot use 1.9 calipers as the pads then fowl my 13" wheels plus I have good 1.6 calipers and expensive 1155's in them but would like 1.9 hubs so I run 309 shafts

 

Sandy: re: front arb's, whats your feeling on removing it? My limited knowledge suggests that when in a corner, the weight transfer and compression of the outside suspension means the arb is trying to lift up the inside one and so removing grip from it which surely is a bad thing?

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
James_R

does he run a plate diff?? mine 309 shafts sounds pretty special on tight lock in the paddock lol

 

the 309 beam option has always been the budget method of making the rear of the 205 more stable, but now bars have become far more available (205 parts jobs) means that a 309 beam isn't always the way to go. But it's worth saying putting GrpA mounts on are a good idea what ever the beam is.

 

James

Edited by James_R

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alastairh
took mine to the ring and hammered it round carousel a few times, if anything were gonna break it would be there! :o

 

I'll show you when EYX is back on the road at the end of the week. Easily noticeable on fly off round abouts, and can be heard on the lanes.

 

And deffinatly nothing else, because everything else is new, and its not the only 205 i've driven with 309 bones and 205 shafts that i've managed to make it do :(

 

Al

Edited by Alastairh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VisaGTi16v

Don't know James but he had a 220bhp S16 lump in it racing last year. I only did one sprint at Lydden with mine running 309 arms and 1.6 shafts/hubs and didnt hear any noises around the paddock or driving there. At tight sprint tracks like Debden I used to get them clicking with the normal length arms so they would almost certainly pop out with the 309 ones but I cannot go to 1.9 hubs due to small wheels, loads of good 13" tyres etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sandy

As long as the spring rates aren't too soft, traction is generally better without a front ARB. I never use one given the choice, my 309 has astonishing traction without one and sensible spring rates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jackherer

I've got the front ARB disconnected at the moment to see if it was the cause of a knock and it may just be my imagination but it seems like the steering feel is a lot nicer particularly on slippery roads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
James_m
does he run a plate diff?? mine 309 shafts sounds pretty special on tight lock in the paddock lol

 

the 309 beam option has always been the budget method of making the rear of the 205 more stable, but now bars have become far more available (205 parts jobs) means that a 309 beam isn't always the way to go. But it's worth saying putting GrpA mounts on are a good idea what ever the beam is.

 

James

Im guessing GrpA mounts make the rear more stable?

Are the O.E mounts not designed to induce geometry change under flex for some kind of benefit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
James_R

maybe when they left the factory some 20years ago, but rubber does get brittle, I've not tried replacing a beam with std new OE mounts. All I can say is that goign from a beam with old std mounts to grp A makes the tail much more stable and predicatble on track.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dave G

who supplies the adjustable bottom arms

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×